[refpolicy] RFC: direct_init_entry breaks direct_initrc
dominick.grift at gmail.com
Tue Jan 14 09:02:08 EST 2014
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 08:56 -0500, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> On 12/10/13 10:57, Dominick Grift wrote:
> > I have not tested this yet and it is a theory
> > I was not there when that type attribute was implemented so i do not
> > know the rationale behind the decision to implement it.
> > Would be nice if anyone could shed some light on that and would be even
> > better if this fix is acknowledged
> It seems like it would probably work, but definitely needs to be tested.
I have tested it. role transitions should happen on the init script and
now on the daemon entry file. This is a bug in the init_run_daemon
interface and it breaks a lot of stuff
Also the init_run_daemon(unconfined_t, unconfined_r) should be make
Removing the init_run_daemon(unconfined_t, unconfined_r) like fedora did
does not solve anything in any sustainable way.
I doubt that unconfined_t role transitions at all without that interface
call so you'd end up with: unconfined_u:unconfined_r:daemon_t instead of
More information about the refpolicy