[refpolicy] Transition unconfined users to dpkg_t domain
bigon at debian.org
Fri Jan 10 06:47:48 EST 2014
Le Thu, 09 Jan 2014 15:32:03 -0500,
Stephen Smalley <sds at tycho.nsa.gov> a écrit :
> On 01/09/2014 03:26 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> > It has been like that for years. Might have been a chicken and egg
> > problem on initial install. RPM Now has better flexibility.
> bootstrapping issue - needed to know the right domain prior to any
> policy files being installed on the filesystem.
Does that means that rpm and dpkg are supposed to work even if the files
in /etc/selinux/<my_current_policy> are missing?
With dpkg (that use the rpm_execcon-like function) I'm getting the
following error in that case:
cannot get security labeling handle: No such file or directory
More information about the refpolicy