[refpolicy] [PATCH/RFC 2/2] Add minidlna policy

Sven Vermeulen sven.vermeulen at siphos.be
Fri May 3 08:02:49 EDT 2013


On May 3, 2013 9:08 AM, "Dominick Grift" <dominick.grift at gmail.com> wrote:
> Looks like compat_net support may have been completely removed:
>
> http://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2009/03/27/144

Now i'm completely lost. Does that mean that the "old", non-labeled
approach is not used anymore? I could've sworn that node_t and netif_t were
still used.

> i think we need more and better, practical examples of how to use
> secmark and how secmark can be configured to match the old compat_net
> functionality
>
> There is one nice how to by Dan Walsh on Linux.com, but other than that
> documentation is lacking in my view

Ack. And also how the default behavior is if no secmark/labeling is used...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://oss.tresys.com/pipermail/refpolicy/attachments/20130503/60918c90/attachment.html 


More information about the refpolicy mailing list