[refpolicy] unconfined_cronjob_t et al
Daniel J Walsh
dwalsh at redhat.com
Fri Aug 19 05:29:45 CDT 2011
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 08/18/2011 03:31 AM, Russell Coker wrote:
> Is anyone actually making use of domains such as
> Is there any reason why I shouldn't just unilaterally remove them
> from the Debian policy for Squeeze regardless of what Red Hat and
> upstream are doing?
> It seems to me that using a different domain for cron jobs causes
> pain with no gain.
I don't think so. I believe cronjobs in Red Hat os's are running
cronjobs as the usertype. I would say this should just be removed.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the refpolicy