[refpolicy] unconfined_cronjob_t et al

Russell Coker russell at coker.com.au
Thu Aug 18 02:35:29 CDT 2011


On Thu, 18 Aug 2011, Russell Coker <russell at coker.com.au> wrote:
> Is there any reason why I shouldn't just unilaterally remove them from the 
> Debian policy for Squeeze regardless of what Red Hat and upstream are
> doing?

Sorry I meant to say Wheezy not Squeeze.  I'm not making big changes for 
Squeeze.

-- 
My Main Blog         http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog    http://doc.coker.com.au/


More information about the refpolicy mailing list