[refpolicy] unconfined_cronjob_t et al
Russell Coker
russell at coker.com.au
Thu Aug 18 02:35:29 CDT 2011
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011, Russell Coker <russell at coker.com.au> wrote:
> Is there any reason why I shouldn't just unilaterally remove them from the
> Debian policy for Squeeze regardless of what Red Hat and upstream are
> doing?
Sorry I meant to say Wheezy not Squeeze. I'm not making big changes for
Squeeze.
--
My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/
More information about the refpolicy
mailing list