[refpolicy] amanda's global requirements were not met: type/attribute inetd_t (No such file or directory).

[Chris PeBenito]

On 09/04/10 09:24, Dominick Grift wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 06:21:08AM -0700, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>> On 09/04/2010 01:46 AM, Dominick Grift wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 08:18:55PM -0700, Justin Mattock wrote:
>>>> Im not sure what I need todo to make amanda happy with this:
>>>> sudo make load
>>>>
>>>>   /usr/share/selinux/mcs/zebra.pp -i /usr/share/selinux/mcs/zosremote.pp
>>>> libsepol.print_missing_requirements: amanda's global requirements were
>>>> not met: type/attribute inetd_t (No such file or directory).
>>>> libsemanage.semanage_link_sandbox: Link packages failed (No such file
>>>> or directory).
>>>> /usr/sbin/semodule:  Failed!
>>>> make: *** [load] Error 1
>>>>
>>>> do I need amanda and sandbox both working for this to work?
>>>
>>> Amanda's global requirements were not met. It has policy to interact with inetd_t but the type is not available:
>>>
>>> 1. is the inetd_t included (made available) in the amanda module?
>>> 2. is the xinetd policy installed?
>>
>> alright... disabling the build of this module, gets me going...
>> as for the xinetd I don't have that on the system, as well as amanda
>
> dependency issue. Ive mentioned issues like this on the IRC channel the other day.
> Refpolicy maintainer does not want to change it.

I want to clarify this.  In the IRC channel we were talking about making 
the evolution dependence on xserver optional, which I reject since 
evolution doesn't work without X, so the policy should follow suit. 
Does amanda work without inetd?  If so, then it can be made optional in 
the policy.  If not, then it stays unconditional in the policy.

--
Chris PeBenito
<pebenito at gentoo.org>
Developer,
Hardened Gentoo Linux